TitleA community of citizens: disability rehabilitation in the Palestinian transition to statehood
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2001
AuthorsGiacaman, R
JournalDisabil Rehabil
Volume23
Pagination639-44
Date PublishedSep 20
ISBN Number0963-8288 (Print)<br/>0963-8288 (Linking)
Accession Number11697462
Keywords*Caregivers, *Civil Rights/trends, *Voluntary Workers, Arabs, Attitude to Health/*ethnology, Community Health Services/manpower/*organization & administration, Consumer Organizations, Consumer Participation, Cost of Illness, Disabled Persons/*rehabilitation, Female, Gender Identity, Health Care Reform, Humans, Israel, Male, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), Social Class, Social Justice/trends, Women, Working/classification
Abstract

PURPOSE: It has been widely argued that community based programmes offer considerable advantages to the classical institutional forms of health and rehabilitation services delivery. With about 10 years of experience in operating community based rehabilitation projects (CBR) for the disabled, the Palestinian experience points to potentially serious problems relating to the conception and operationalization of such programmes in real life situations. ISSUES: Of importance is the issue of the impact of communal care on the already burdened lives of women, especially when such care is expected to be voluntary in nature. Caretaking in the Palestinian context, especially of the disabled, elderly and the sick, is a pre-defined sex linked role dictated by a patriarchal society and system of policy making that excludes women from economic and social life. The voluntary care aspect entailed in the CBR conception and practice, can and does contribute further to the exclusion of women not only from the labour force, but from most other aspects of life as well. This represents an apparent contradiction between the needs of two excluded groups, the disabled and women. The other problematic entailed in the communal model of caring for the disabled is the strategic and operational bias focusing on community, to the exclusion of the notion of social rights of all citizens, and the role and duty of state structures in the fulfilment of the disabled basic needs. Such an approach can only relegate the disabled rights back to their original place as charity. On the other hand, when CBR projects are operated holistically, in the context of social movements existing within power relation and with a broader democratic agenda engaging different groups-including a disability movement-as is currently taking place in Palestine, CBR projects can also turn into a mobilizing force for the social rights of all excluded groups. CONCLUSION: Thus the question is not merely one of governmental involvement as opposed to the involvement of non-governmental organizations and charitable societies in community based projects. Rather, it is a question of the right to a decent life for all, in dignity and security, that citizenship and statehood promise, but have yet to deliver in many developing countries, especially in Palestine.

Downloads: